×

274% more traffic from our own experiment

We tell our clients to invest in their websites. Here's what happened when we did exactly that to our own.

Practicing what we preach — or not.

Wizardly builds websites for biotech and SaaS companies. We've seen the data enough times to know: consistent content creates compounding traffic. But for a stretch, our own site was sitting still while we focused on client work. Same story we see all the time — the cobbler's kids have no shoes.

So we pulled our GA4 data across two six-month windows and ran our own site through the same analysis we'd give a client.

Before we ramped up marketing, we had 700 page views a month and 258 unique users. Not bad for a six-person agency. But we knew it wasn't what we were capable of.

What consistent marketing does to a website.

Dec 2024–May 2025 vs. Jul 2025–Jan 2026. All numbers are monthly averages.

Before Marketing Push
Page Views / mo: 700
Unique Users / mo: 258
Sessions / mo: 416
Services Page / mo: 26 views
Resources Page / mo: 21 views
After Marketing Push
Page Views / mo: 2,619
Unique Users / mo: 1,574
Sessions / mo: 1,749
Services Page / mo: 134 views
Resources Page / mo: 131 views

The headline metrics.

+274%
Page Views
700/mo → 2,619/mo
+510%
Unique Users
258/mo → 1,574/mo
+524%
Resources Page
21 → 131 views/mo
53×
XtalPi Case Study
21 → 1,112 views

Traffic went to the pages that matter.

The growth didn't concentrate at the homepage. It flowed to Services, Resources, and Portfolio — the pages where someone decides whether to contact us. That's the outcome we design for in client sites. It held true here too.

+415%
Services Page Views From 26 views/month to 134. The page where people decide whether to hire us is now getting real traffic.
+524%
Resources Page Views From 21 views/month to 131. Content is pulling people deeper into the site.
+233%
Inquiry Page Views From 5 views/month to 16. Engagement time on the inquiry page jumped from 29s to 50s. Higher-intent visitors staying longer.

A single case study. 53× the traffic.

The XtalPi case study was the standout performer. Before the marketing push: 21 views. After: 1,112. That's the exact playbook we build for clients — create one high-quality piece of content, promote it through the right channels, and let it pull people to the pages that convert. It works on our site too.

The XtalPi case study alone accounts for 1,112 views — 53× what it was getting before. That's the same strategy we build for our clients.
50s
Inquiry Page
Up from 29s
59s
Logo Design
Up from 15s
31s
Contact Page
Up from 25s

Where the growth showed up.

Monthly averages, before and after the marketing push.

Page Before /mo After /mo Growth
Services 26 134 +415%
Resources 21 131 +524%
Portfolio 73 220 +201%
Contact 54 72 +33%
Inquiry 5 16 +233%
About Wizardly 24 38 +55%

What worked — and what to watch.

We apply this lens to every client. We apply it to ourselves too.

What Worked

Traffic went where it needed to go

Services up 415%, Resources up 524%, Portfolio up 201%. Not just homepage vanity traffic — people finding the pages that lead to conversations.

One case study, outsized returns

XtalPi at 1,112 views proves the model. A single great case study, promoted well, pulls meaningful traffic. Now we need to replicate that for Ketryx, Medicilon, Sublime, and Alloy.

Engagement lifted on conversion pages

Inquiry page up from 29s to 50s. Contact up from 25s to 31s. Higher intent, longer reads — the visitors arriving are closer to ready.

What to Watch

Form submissions aren't tracked

The same gap we call out for clients. Inquiry and contact pages are getting real traffic with strong engagement — but we can't report an actual conversion rate yet. Fixing this now.

Blog engagement is shallow

Most posts at 2–4s engagement time. Social traffic is scanning, not reading. Blog content is working as top-of-funnel discovery — but deeper resources need to be the conversion play.

Case study promotion is uneven

XtalPi has 1,112 views. Alloy dropped to 1. Ketryx held at 41. The model works — we just need to rotate promotion across all five stories, not just the one that happened to catch fire.

What would your numbers look like?

We ran the same analysis on our own site that we run for every client. If you're curious what yours would show — let's find out.

Start a Project
All comparisons use monthly averages to normalize for different period lengths (6 months before vs. 6.7 months after).
Before window: Dec 2024–May 2025. After window: Jul 2025–Jan 2026.
Growth reflects increased investment in LinkedIn posting, blog content, resource creation, and case study promotion.

Prepared by Wizardly · wizardly.co

Recent Resources